latimes.com/local/la-me-cap-flextime-20140206,0,1227743.column
Democrats' blanket rejection of flextime is shortsighted
Republicans argue that easing overtime rules could benefit both workers and
employers, but political polarization bars closer examination of the
issues.
George Skelton
Capitol Journal
5:53 PM PST, February 5, 2014 - Los Angeles Times
SACRAMENTO—News flash for Democratic state lawmakers: Not all Republican
ideas are kooky.
Some make sense. A few GOP bills might even help struggling workers — the
very people Democrats are supposed to be fighting for in the state Capitol.
One such idea is to expand the opportunity for flextime, the ability of wage
earners to schedule their work hours to fit personal and family needs.
I'm thinking especially of low-income, single parents — moms or dads.
Some may prefer to work, say, four 10-hour days rather than five eight-hour
shifts. Then they'd have three days off a week.
But that would require giving up two hours of overtime pay after working
eight hours. And unions object to that as a blanket rule. So, therefore, do
Democratic legislators, who fall obediently in line with their political
patrons.
Republicans have been pushing flextime year after year for a decade and been
shot down each time.
"It always runs into the buzz saw of party-line voting," says Senate Minority
Leader Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar). "It seems to be a flashpoint for labor unions.
Like, they won't even consider it.
"We always talk about job creation. I don't think the majority party even
knows what that means."
The long-running Sacramento debate over flextime came to mind as I skimmed
Maria Shriver's latest tome on women. Titled the Shriver Report, it's about
American working women "on the brink." It's 433 pages of slick paper, women's
essays and polling data — doorstop size — that cites many problems facing female
workers and offers solutions.
Some solutions are politically problematic, such as a national requirement
for paid sick leave. Others are no-brainers, such as equal pay for equal work —
and flextime.
That caught my eye because no one has a more Democratic pedigree than
Shriver, the niece of President John F. Kennedy and daughter of Sargent Shriver,
architect of President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty. Yet, ironically, it's
Democrats who keep killing flextime in Sacramento.
Full confession: My daughter co-edited the book and has worked with Shriver
on previous projects. But it was another daughter, a nurse, who got me writing
about flextime 20 years ago when she was a stressed single mom trying to juggle
hospital and parent duties.
Nurses today are provided more flextime opportunities than most workers.
California has what's called an eight-hour day. Generally, any hours worked
over that — with some exceptions for nurses and farm hands — must be paid at
time-and-a-half, unless another arrangement is negotiated by a labor union.
So right there you can see a valuable recruiting tool for unions. Sign up
with us, they can tell workers, and we'll negotiate some flextime for you.
Unions argue that workers can actually do this on their own. But the law
makes it complicated. Employees can ask their employer for an alternative work
schedule and, if the boss agrees along with two-thirds of the workers in a
secret ballot, the flextime is approved. There'd still be overtime pay after a
40-hour week.
A two-thirds vote requirement? That's something Democrats normally abhor in
legislative chambers.
"California law is extremely difficult to navigate," says Debbie Horne, a
human resources director for a Santa Barbara manufacturer who has lobbied
unsuccessfully at the Capitol for flextime. "There are too many hurdles. And
companies just don't want to go down that path."
Unions also point out that workers can ask to leave a job early — to pick up
a kid or go to a doctor — and make up the work later in the same workweek.
But Republicans want to make it simple: Allow employees to work up to 10
hours a day without overtime, but still require extra pay after putting in more
than a 40-hour week.
That's the way it was briefly in the 1990s, when Republican Pete Wilson was
governor and the GOP controlled the Assembly. Democrats soon recaptured the
house and labor-indebted Gov. Gray Davis signed the current law in 1999.
Significantly, the vast majority of other states allow flextime under
provisions sought by California Republicans.
"It works in 47 other states," says Assembly Minority Leader Connie Conway
(R-Tulare), whose flex bill is the latest to be killed by Democrats. "We should
be able to figure this out. We're smarter and better. Some labor flexibility
doesn't seem like that big an 'ask' to me."
Responds Caitlin Vega, lobbyist for the California Federation of Labor: "We
believe that having an eight-hour day is important to give people time to go
home to their families. Eight hours of work, eight hours of rest, eight hours of
what we will."
Problem is, many single parents need a full weekday for household management
and kid duties. Also, avoiding commute traffic an extra day a week would help
out with global warming — another supposed Democratic concern.
Conway's bill got a routine hanging in the Assembly Labor and Employment
Committee on Jan. 8.
Labor warned that if the measure became law, employers would intimidate
workers into accepting 10-hour days to avoid paying overtime.
The state Chamber of Commerce countered there was no evidence of that in
other states. It called flextime a "job creator."
The bill was rejected on a party-line vote — symptomatic of political
polarization and one-party rule in Sacramento.
Republican ideas are summarily dismissed — unless they're good enough to be
stolen by Democrats. So here's one to steal.
george.skelton@latimes.com
Copyright © 2014, Los
Angeles Times